Validation
PlateMate vs AMTI
A study by University of Belgrade has compared PlateMate to golden standard AMTI force plates in Spring 2025.
The article is called “Laboratory-Grade Accuracy on a Budget: Concurrent Validity of CC Athletics Portable Force Plates for Vertical Jump Analysis” and has just been submitted. The preprint is available here:
PlateMate vs Vald ForceDecks: Raw Signal Comparison – Drop Jump
Internal test (CC Athletics office) Single-subject comparison of CC Athletics PlateMate (960 Hz) and Vald ForceDecks (1000 Hz) on a 5-drop-jump recording. The Vald plate sat on top of PlateMate (stacked), so both devices recorded the same physical event simultaneously…
PlateMate vs Vald ForceDecks: Raw Signal Comparison – CMJ
Internal test (CC Athletics office) This blog post compares raw force-plate signals from CC Athletics PlateMate (960 Hz) and Vald ForceDecks (1000 Hz) on a single recording: one subject performing 5 countermovement jumps (CMJs). Setup: the Vald plate was placed on top…
PlateMate vs Bertec/Hawkin: Raw Signal Comparison
Internal test (CC Athletics office) Validation against Bertec ForcePlate (Hawkin Dynamic processing) This blog post compares raw force-plate signals from CC Athletics PlateMate (960 Hz) and a Bertec force plate processed by Hawkin Dynamic software (1000 Hz), captured…
PlateMate vs Vald ForceDecks: A Direct Comparison of Metrics
PlateMate vs Vald ForceDecks: A Direct Comparison of Metrics By Claes C. Jakobsen, Owner & Engineer at CC Athletics Date: October 9th, 2025 We’ve been eager to share more validation data for PlateMate, and today I’m excited to present our internal…
PlateMate vs. MyJump App, a comparison of jump height, contact time and flight time.
PlateMate vs. MyJump App, a comparison of jump height, contact time and flight time Abstract A comparison of PlateMate and the MyJump app have been made on three variables, jump height, contact time, and flight time. Nine elite athletes were tested and filmed, and the…